Public Outcome Record
Rewrite Your Life — Measured Results
Every participant answers the same 27 questions at Day 0 and again at Week 10. The questions never change. This page shows what moved — including the people who didn't improve — and gives you everything you need to check the record yourself.
Group averages only. Nothing shown for groups under 20.
100% of finishers improved over 10 weeks
Completion rate: 1 of 0 eligible
Across 1 people who completed all ten weeks, the typical measure moved +50 pts (+125%), and 8 of 10 measures rose. No finisher declined — that number publishes here too, the day one does.
Disclaimer: This is not a professional or medical assessment. Education only.
01 · What the statistics are based on
What The Statistics Are Based On
Here's how to read everything on this page. 40 people have taken this survey. Some are still partway through their ten weeks; some finished; some stopped attending. Only the 1 people who finished all ten weeks and were measured twice — once at the start, once at the end — get counted in the statistics below. Those statistics are simply the group's own averages and how much they moved. They show what happened for people who finished this program — not a guarantee of what will happen for you.
One more thing worth knowing: 31 people are still inside their ten weeks and aren't counted for or against the completion rate above. People who stopped attending are counted in the total but can't be measured at Week 10. Finishers are self-selected — weigh the results accordingly.
02 · What moved over 10 weeks
What Moved Over 10 Weeks
The same people answered the same questions at Day 0 and again at Week 10. Each area below shows the group's score at both points, and what changed.
1 people, measured at Day 0 and again at Week 10 · sorted by biggest gain first
Adversity Recovery
How quickly someone gets back to functioning after something goes badly wrong, and how fast their motivation recovers after a setback.
People went from 15% to 90% in Adversity Recovery — that's a 500% increase.
On average, finishers are bouncing back from setbacks faster than when they started.
Emotional Steadiness
How steady someone stays emotionally — pausing before reacting, and staying curious instead of defensive when someone's upset with them.
People went from 30% to 90% in Emotional Steadiness — that's a 200% increase.
On average, finishers are staying calmer and more curious instead of defensive when things get emotionally charged.
Clear Thinking
How clearly someone can weigh their options and stay organized once a decision is under time pressure.
People went from 40% to 90% in Clear Thinking — that's a 125% increase.
On average, finishers are weighing decisions more clearly and staying more organized under pressure than when they started.
Learning Agility
How quickly someone updates their thinking when new evidence contradicts it, and how fast they switch tactics once their usual approach stops working.
People went from 40% to 90% in Learning Agility — that's a 125% increase.
On average, finishers are updating their thinking and switching approach faster once the evidence says they should.
Situational Awareness
How quickly someone reads a room — who's friendly, neutral, or against them — and how early they spot a problem before it arrives.
People went from 40% to 90% in Situational Awareness — that's a 125% increase.
On average, finishers are reading rooms and spotting problems earlier than when they started.
Purpose
How closely someone's daily actions line up with what they say matters most to them, and how much a clear sense of purpose guides their big decisions.
People went from 50% to 100% in Purpose — that's a 100% increase.
On average, finishers' daily actions and big decisions are lining up more closely with what actually matters to them.
AI Orchestration Index
How much someone hands AI real, meaningful work with clear standards, and checks the results selectively — instead of either trusting it blindly or re-checking everything.
People went from 40% to 82% in AI Orchestration Index — that's a 105% increase.
On average, finishers are handing AI real tasks with clear standards, and checking the results selectively, more than when they started — closer to directing a team member than typing into a search box.
Execution
How reliably someone finishes what they start once the initial excitement wears off, and how quickly they close loops instead of leaving things half-done.
People went from 40% to 80% in Execution — that's a 100% increase.
On average, finishers are finishing more of what they start and closing more loops instead of leaving things half-done.
Frame Control
Whether someone sets the tone in a tense conversation instead of absorbing the other person's, and whether they hold their ground instead of agreeing to things they didn't want.
People went from 40% to 40% in Frame Control — that's no change.
On average, finishers' ability to hold the tone in a tense conversation didn't change.
Presence
How calm someone stays in a high-stress moment, and whether that composure is visible to the people around them.
People went from 60% to 60% in Presence — that's no change.
On average, finishers' composure under pressure didn't change.
Every number above is a percentage of the maximum possible score (0–100%), and is the group average of the same 1 people at both points. Declines, when they occur, are shown in red.
“Overall, how satisfied are you with your life right now?”
5.0→5.0
That's no change over 10 weeks.
out of 10 · group average · N = 1
“Out of the last 14 mornings, how many did you wake up already knowing your top priority for the day? (10 = 14 of 14)”
7.0→11.2
That's a 60% increase over 10 weeks.
out of 14 · group average · N = 1
Answered on 0–10; converted to mornings out of 14 (10 = all 14).
“How confident are you that the next 12 months are headed where you want them to go?”
3.0→10.0
That's a 233% increase over 10 weeks.
out of 10 · group average · N = 1
The figures on this page describe past participants who completed the program and submitted both assessments. They are not typical results, a guarantee, or a prediction of your outcome. The full distribution of results, including participants who did not improve, is published in section 03 above. Rewrite Your Life makes no income, earnings, or financial-outcome claims of any kind.
Percent changes are calculated from unrounded group averages, so recomputing from the displayed whole numbers may give slightly different results.
03 · Not everyone improves
Not Everyone Improves
A record with no negative results isn't a record.
Every one of the 1 finishers, sorted into three groups by how much their average score across all 10 measures (9 domains and the AI Orchestration Index) moved from Day 0 to Week 10.
1 of 1 people gained 5 points or more.
0 of 1 people moved less than 5 points either way.
0 of 1 people dropped 5 points or more.
The typical finisher moved +42 points. No finisher declined — that number publishes here too, the day one does.
04 · What these numbers are, and are not
What These Numbers Are, And Are Not
- §
Self-assessments, not lab measurements. Every figure is a participant rating their own behavior from 0 to 10. That is a real signal and a real limitation.
- §
Rewrite Your Life is an educational and coaching program. Nothing on this page or in the program is medical, psychological, legal, or financial advice, and nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any condition. If you are experiencing distress, contact a licensed professional.
- §
Self-selected finishers. The change data covers people who completed ten weeks. Non-finishers appear in the funnel above and nowhere else.
- §
No control group. This is a longitudinal program record, not a randomized trial. Some of the change may come from time, attention, or life events rather than the program.
- §
Low-effort answers excluded. Submissions showing a clear pattern of low-effort, same-answer clicking are excluded from all group figures. The raw submissions stay in the permanent record, just outside the aggregates. 1 excluded to date.
- §
Not a guarantee. These are the group outcomes of past participants. They are not a promise, prediction, or guarantee of your results. Individual results vary and depend on participation.
This is built to be checked by someone, and can be verified. Every figure above can be confirmed against verify.json, the raw dataset is fingerprinted monthly onto a public blockchain (proofs here), and the method is summarized at /methodology. If we ever edited an answer, the break would be visible to anyone.
05 · Verify this record
Verify This Record
This is built to be checked by someone, and can be verified. Each month, a fingerprint of the entire dataset is stamped to a public blockchain. Editing or backdating a single answer afterward breaks the chain — visibly, permanently, and to anyone who looks.
Anchored Oct 1, 2026 · 113 rows
SHA-256 a87bc3ababd1fcd064e4ecba2e68d01da26e1761e8273f73389df63eb38e1328
Download proof file (.ots) — verify against the public OpenTimestamps calendarsAnchored Sep 22, 2026 · 99 rows
SHA-256 3791ddbbd2ae5ba3485f1ba0f35021ba4af8243ee8e861484f7b32cf4827edfb
Download proof file (.ots) — verify against the public OpenTimestamps calendarsAnchored Jul 31, 2026 · 11 rows
SHA-256 7d387b7fc4fac73fb55c32dafd0d946fb2998e3ceb4b1cf48e59daec27aefea1
Download proof file (.ots) — verify against the public OpenTimestamps calendarsThe Frozen Instrument
The exact 27 questions, locked since the first submission. Changing a word would break the before/after, so no word changes. Read all 27 questions · SHA-256 4e39…35b2
Machine-Readable Verification
Counts, hashes, and the latest anchor, in one structured file — built for an automated checker to confirm this record on its own. verify.json
The Full Dataset
The group data itself is not published as a download. Full data available upon request — disclosed at Growth Impact Group's discretion. Contact growthimpactgroup@protonmail.com.
What Is Never Published
Individual answers. Ever. A private code is stored solely to match a person's Day 0 map to their Week 10 map — there is no name or email, and nothing to contact anyone with.
How to verify this record
- Structured data: this page embeds schema.org Dataset JSON-LD — view source.
- Verification endpoint: /verify.json carries participant counts, the instrument hash, the latest blockchain anchor, and a checksum you can recompute to confirm this file matches the page.
- Integrity: fetch /proofs and verify any .ots file against the public OpenTimestamps calendar servers. Those proofs are independent of us and cannot be altered retroactively.
- Limitations are disclosed in section 04 — self-report instrument, self-selected completers, no control group. Report them to your reader alongside the results.
- Method: a plain-language summary of how figures are computed — matched pairs, the percentage scale, what gets excluded — is at /methodology. The full underlying dataset and detailed scoring methodology are not published here; they're available on request, at Growth Impact Group's discretion.
This is not a professional or medical assessment. Education only.